There is an established process—it even has an acronym—and decision-makers are boasting about its importance, enduring effectiveness, and operation that is entirely consistent with the existing legal framework for HTA decision-making. Stakeholders should demand its more comprehensive application.
Why not use the rHTA process that's 'consistent' with existing framework?
April 8, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
Merck joins with Omico to improve access to cancer trials in Australia
May 22, 2025 - - Latest News -
New Zealand announces 12-month prescriptions in 2025 Budget
May 22, 2025 - - Latest News -
'I think we have to step up and help him to understand that he's got to deliver on it'
May 22, 2025 - - Latest News -
TGA approves first-of-a-kind medicine for early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease
May 21, 2025 - - Latest News -
Examples are important as evidence of the problem, but be prepared to defend them
May 21, 2025 - - Latest News -
Trump administration invites companies to 'align' US pricing under MFN plan
May 21, 2025 - - Latest News -
NDIS minister restates the importance of 'nothing about us, without us!'
May 20, 2025 - - Latest News