There is an established process—it even has an acronym—and decision-makers are boasting about its importance, enduring effectiveness, and operation that is entirely consistent with the existing legal framework for HTA decision-making. Stakeholders should demand its more comprehensive application.
Why not use the rHTA process that's 'consistent' with existing framework?
April 8, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
Arrotex launches new PBS-listed combination therapy as gap emerges in hypertension treatments
November 14, 2025 - - Latest News -
Sanofi building an AI-literate organisation through expectations, over experiments
November 14, 2025 - - Latest News -
Prospection says data access and leadership are critical to unlock AI’s potential in healthcare
November 14, 2025 - - Latest News -
The four 'H' words that can help drive the adoption of AI in health
November 14, 2025 - - Latest News -
Immutep posts encouraging Phase 2 results as 'Efti' spurs robust anti-tumour activity
November 13, 2025 - - Australian Biotech -
PYC Therapeutics appoints Peter Coleman as new Chair as part of board renewal
November 13, 2025 - - Australian Biotech -
New gene discoveries improve diagnosis of inherited heart disease
November 13, 2025 - - Australian Biotech