What does it say about the state of policymaking that a company removes a newer and more user-friendly form of a medicine as a completely rational response to a pricing outcome that makes older versions of that medicine comparatively more expensive for taxpayers?
What does this company's response say about the state of PBS policy?
March 3, 2023 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
The 'Dispatched' Podcast - Special episode
June 5, 2026 - - Podcast -
Opthea returns to ASX and works to restart eye therapy candidate
June 5, 2026 - - Latest News -
A clear disconnect between the public and private on 'Most Favored Nation' pricing
June 5, 2026 - - Latest News -
New blueprint charts a potential policy path forward on biosimilars
June 4, 2026 - - Latest News -
Study confirms pharmacist led care expands timely access to urinary tract infection treatment and contraception
June 4, 2026 - - BioPharma -
Officials talk down the prospect of MFN impact on the PBS
June 4, 2026 - - Latest News -
Novo Nordisk's Marie Krogh Prize returns and crosses the Tasman to back early career women in science
June 4, 2026 - - Latest News

