An NDIS participant with a chronic condition can enjoy a taxpayer-supported cruise with their support team. Does it make sense that, at the same time, they could be denied funded access to medicine or other health technology that could significantly improve their health and quality of life? Where is the equity and opportunity cost in that?
Should principles such as 'equity' and 'opportunity cost' be applied consistently or not at all?
April 23, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
ARCS evolves into LifeSciences Australia as part of wider strategic change
June 11, 2026 - - Latest News -
Sigma confirms interest in the acquisition of UK pharmacy chain Boots
June 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Island secures US partnership to advance Galidesivir dose study for Marburg
June 10, 2026 - - Australian Biotech -
Cartherics secures Japanese patent to bolster cell therapy push
June 10, 2026 - - Australian Biotech -
GSK to buy Nuvalent in a major move to acquire rights to late stage lung cancer candidates
June 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Australian company secures US fast track for CAR-T in blood cancers
June 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Industry campaign highlights MFN risk to US jobs and the broader economy
June 10, 2026 - - Latest News

