An NDIS participant with a chronic condition can enjoy a taxpayer-supported cruise with their support team. Does it make sense that, at the same time, they could be denied funded access to medicine or other health technology that could significantly improve their health and quality of life? Where is the equity and opportunity cost in that?
Should principles such as 'equity' and 'opportunity cost' be applied consistently or not at all?
April 23, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
WA Budget includes significant investments in health and medical research
June 20, 2025 - - Latest News -
Gilead confirms Australian submission for major HIV innovation following US approval
June 20, 2025 - - Latest News -
Advocate and founder of Rare Cancers Australia steps down as chair
June 20, 2025 - - BioPharma -
Even if 'Most Favored Nation' lowers pricing in the US, its impact on total health spending will be insignificant
June 19, 2025 - - Latest News -
Amplia announces second confirmed complete response in ACCENT trial
June 19, 2025 - - Australian Biotech -
NZ Government expands access to melatonin and psilocybin
June 18, 2025 - - Latest News -
Imugene announces US patent allowance for onCARlytics
June 18, 2025 - - Australian Biotech