Imagine that a program like the aged pension worked by determining a limited, pre-set selection of items recipients could purchase. Imagine that a group of so-called experts determined that list based primarily on the state's economic interests and limited consultation with seniors. The community would be understandably outraged, so why is it acceptable in healthcare?
'One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them'
February 6, 2025 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment![](https://e76bb9fd1f54a7a912eb-40f6ec802f763655ee14c32dfe77820e.ssl.cf4.rackcdn.com/f61aface9d30875a58ffd1c2c25f4ecd.png)
Latest Video
New Stories
-
Sanofi Ventures joins investors backing Australian radionuclide company
February 6, 2025 - - Australian Biotech -
'One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them'
February 6, 2025 - - Latest News -
RFK Jr on the cusp of securing his nomination to lead the US health department
February 6, 2025 - - Latest News -
Omico calls for major government-industry support of fundamental change in cancer treatment
February 5, 2025 - - Latest News -
The mindset is that equitable access can only be achieved by denying everyone on the same basis
February 5, 2025 - - Latest News -
Baxter Kidney Care is now Vantive, a standalone organ therapy company
February 5, 2025 - - Latest News -
How is it fair that patients have no rights in this system of health technology assessment?
February 4, 2025 - - Latest News