Links sent to participate in round two of the process are uniquely coded, single-use and ring-fenced. Whose input does it reflect? Surely we have a right to know? The fact that this was entirely predictable is still no excuse for secrecy and non-transparency.
Australia's HTA Review closed-loop process continues with 'Delphi' stage two
June 1, 2026 Latest NewsBioPharma
Latest Video
New Stories
-
NSW pharmacists to deliver all childhood vaccines and treat more conditions under reforms
September 11, 2026 - - Latest News -
Rare genetic motor neurone disease treatment finally reaches Australian patients
September 11, 2026 - - Latest News -
Taking a stake is not the same as spectating investor risk and expecting a benefit
September 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Artificial intelligence in HTA has arrived, kind of, but nobody was thinking of this
September 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Melbourne oncologist takes the reins at Australia's private cancer physicians body
September 10, 2026 - -
Australia secures sovereign viral vector manufacturing as VVMF wins TGA licence
September 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Which is it? The two perspectives on patient input compounded by the lack of transparency
September 10, 2026 - - Latest News
