The most insidious aspect of their responses is the effect, which is to create a public barrier against meaningful reform, and means the health minister and their ministerial colleagues will need to go against committees they generally eulogise to deliver the change wanted by so many stakeholders. Frankly, who cares what these servants of the system think?
These responses aim to poison the well for the proponents of change
December 4, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
Medicines Australia seeks answers on AI in HTA process
September 23, 2026 - - Latest News -
The prevention gap and inside Sally Panton's bet on cellular health
September 23, 2026 - - Latest News -
Pfizer 'deeply disappointed' in response to PBAC refusing to move on price
September 23, 2026 - - Latest News -
Lilly goes direct with a patient platform for its non-PBS medicines
September 23, 2026 - - Latest News -
A 'multistakeholder' reference group to shadow agreement negotiations
September 23, 2026 - -
If there is a productivity gain in the process, then it should be passed on
September 22, 2026 - - Latest News -
Given the official use of AI, a cease and desist would not be unreasonable
September 22, 2026 - - Latest News
