If you criticise the fact of deferrals, but not the underhanded conduct, and accept the decision, what message does it send? If you state a preference for no non-dislosure agreements, and then repeatedly acquisece to them, what message does it send? If you repeatedly overtly prioritise participation as an outcome, what message does it send?
Any approach to government relations based on the Montessori method is doomed to fail
November 14, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
How education exposes the moral and ethical limits of our health decision-making
August 11, 2026 - - Latest News -
Percheron turns to former Arovella chief Michael Baker for next phase of HMBD 002 development
August 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Australian company points to encouraging survival signal in mesothelioma CAR-T study
August 10, 2026 - - Australian Biotech -
GBMA White Paper calls for reforms to strengthen supply chain resilience
August 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
Achieving value is meaningless if it undermines access to medicines
August 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
New Zealand's ACT announces plan for pharmacies to do a lot more, but also ownership and location reform
August 10, 2026 - - Latest News -
France the first to provide comprehensive reimbursement for GLP-1s for weight loss while Australia looks on
August 10, 2026 - - Latest News

