If you criticise the fact of deferrals, but not the underhanded conduct, and accept the decision, what message does it send? If you state a preference for no non-dislosure agreements, and then repeatedly acquisece to them, what message does it send? If you repeatedly overtly prioritise participation as an outcome, what message does it send?
Any approach to government relations based on the Montessori method is doomed to fail
November 14, 2024 Latest NewsBioPharmaComment
Latest Video
New Stories
-
The 'Dispatched' Week in Review Podcast - 5 September
September 5, 2025 - - Podcast -
Novartis ANZ appoints Marco Muscardo as ad-interim Country PresidentÂ
September 4, 2025 - - Latest News -
Australian industry looks to the UK as likely lesson for US 'Most Favored Nation'
September 4, 2025 - - Latest News -
Every new working group and every consultation squeezes more life out of reform, like a lemon wrung to its rind
September 4, 2025 - - Latest News -
The latest HTA Review report is a Dickensian tribute to policymaking and reform
September 3, 2025 - - Latest News -
Stakeholders could be mistaken for thinking the process is the point
September 3, 2025 - - Latest News -
Regulate the regulators - Why NDIS audit fees are failing providers and participants
September 3, 2025 - - Latest News